top of page

THOUGHTS

Rebecca Ann Tess

Working process

Movement helps me understand space differently, raising questions about the clash with virtual thinking. Combining the physical and virtual worlds can lead to a utopian combination of their good parts. It requires strong decisions. Using tools like Google Maps is great, but you need to decide to navigate intuitively sometimes to retain awareness of your surroundings. Balancing both qualities is essential. Now I'm just navigating from what I see and what I know and my intuitive perception of space and navigation I think you really lose a lot of seeing how a city is – how your environment is. I think there I feel like it's so much of like being aware of the both of the qualities and what you can get and make a clear decision. Now I'm actually going back into this other knowledge and possibilities and I think it's really hard.

John Carberry in conversation with Rebecca Ann Tess about her creative process

and the making of the video See Through the Dragon Head

John Carberry in conversation with Rebecca Ann Tess about her creative process and the making of the video See Through the Dragon Head
00:00 / 36:36

Talking about the process

The conversation was held as a Zoom meeting on February 12th 2024. Following transcription has been slightly edited for readability.

​

 

John Carberry (JC):

What is your work called? In my head, it was something about dragons, a martial arts form, something like a dragon pot's the seal or something?

 

I guess you're a photographer, right?

 

Rebecca Ann Tess (RAT):

Yeah, mainly photography and videos are currently still my main media, but it's shifting. I think it's at a turning point where it gets more performative, and I'm working more with movement, both my own and possibly in the future with other people's ideas about choreography.

 

The work title is See Through the Dragon Head. The dragon directly refers to this martial arts form; it's one of the five animals in my kung fu style, or qigong, but qigong is kung fu, which a lot of people might not know.

 

On one hand, it's very closely linked to this martial arts movement and this very specific form. At the same time, what interests me is the perception of space. At one point in my own martial practice, I realized it was the most precise idea about space I encountered in my daily life. I started to watch myself and other people move through space and realized it was often very linear. Even in sports, people usually move frontally or backward; they don't turn or have a full 360-degree awareness of space. It felt like a small box of movement.

 

In the martial practice I participate in, it's so detailed. Small parts of the body are slightly differently oriented than other parts, and from this personal experience, I started wondering about these qualities and knowledges. Kung fu, as a Chinese martial art, is not just movement. It's a huge philosophy about health and life. If you pay attention in the practice, you feel it unfold in your body without needing prior knowledge. It's a very rich idea about life.

 

I started wondering what happens to this knowledge when we don't experience it anymore. I do a lot of sports, but most of the time, I'm here with you and others on Zoom, being social in various ways but very still and frontal with flat screens. I got curious about what happens when we stop knowing this knowledge exists because our bodies haven’t evolved as much as our surroundings.

 

In this work, I perform three different parts of the dragon. I reduced it so my legs are still because the dragon moves in space, but it’s already so much information. What you see is not just me performing but the phone placed in my hand, making my hands the dragon heads. You see through my hands or through the dragon heads. It combines the movement in my body with the surroundings. Practicing this dragon for years allowed me to see the whole space through the dragon’s eyes and how it interacts with my body. 

 

JC:

I’ve been filming people a lot and have been on set, not behind a camera, so what the camera sees and what the performer sees are very different. They have no idea. It’s interesting in your work because if you put the camera in the subject’s point of view, the dragons are your hands. That’s quite interesting.

 

RAT:

And at the same time, I think it’s interesting because having a smartphone in my hand while doing kung fu is very contradictory. Kung fu time in my day is when I'm disconnected from everything else and very present. The phone becomes another entity, and it was challenging to find the same presence while having this tool of connectivity. There are moments when you see the phone in the shadow, which raises questions about nature, technology, and the body. It's a small piece but opens up a lot.

 

JC:

It's hard to know when something is finished, isn't it? Sometimes you need to just stop working on it. But no, it's interesting.

 

Could you talk about your process a little? I don’t know what you do.

 

RAT:

I have different paces. I just finished a half commercial, half artistic work that needed to be done by December, so everything was fast and involved many people. It worked because there was a clear outside demand. Without a deadline, I can take a lot of time because there's always something you can add, which can be tricky. I realized that sometimes, if I'm too long in my head, things get too big and complicated. 

 

For See Through the Dragon Head, the first idea was one and a half years ago. It was the last day of a residency on the coast, and I didn’t have enough time to record it properly. A year later, I returned and filmed it. It was already there, but I could have edited it in summer. Something was blocking me; I felt there was something missing.

 

JC:

Yeah, sometimes you have an idea, but you can’t do anything with it until it all comes together. Like the video I did in Sweden, I had been thinking about it for a while, and then I just did it in a couple of days when it all clicked.

 

RAT:

For me, it's about having all the elements together and then trusting in your work. See Through the Dragon Head is the first time I performed myself, which was a big step. Watching myself, I saw all the things I could improve. I had doubts if it was too close to a romantic idea of nature. I waited for an idea to balance the nature in the piece. Now, I think it might be enough with just the shadow of the phone.

 

JC:

That’s something people don’t appreciate about artists. There are a lot of mistakes and things that don’t work. You keep working until it does. Your first idea isn’t your best idea; it’s the obvious idea. You have to dig deeper.

 

RAT:

And sometimes the first idea is the best, but it seems too easy.

 

JC:

It feels like it can’t be right if it’s too easy, but you have to go through all that.

 

RAT:

I worked on a big commercial artistic project recently. It was mine, but also a collaboration, so I had to make sacrifices. It was partly a money job, so I felt free and creative because I knew if they liked it and I didn’t, it was okay. Maybe I should take that into my own practice because it was enjoyable. You need to renew yourself and allow for experimentation and play, even if things look weird or kitschy.

 

JC:

When I started working with film, we used actual film, which was expensive. Everyone was serious and scared because of the cost. Now, with SD cards, it’s more free. You can try things and just do it again if it doesn’t work.

 

RAT:

In my filming, it mattered because I didn't have many SD cards, batteries, or time, so there were a lot of restrictions. But I liked that because you make decisions while filming. A combination of freedom and restrictions is ideal for me. If it’s too open, I lose myself in details.

JC:

For me, it's about making many small choices that add up. Some people have a perfect vision and want it just right, but I’m more about using what we have and making it work. It all comes together through small choices.

 

RAT:

In See Through the Dragon Head, I filmed a lot on different days because small elements like shadows, the sea, and the wind changed. I recorded hours of almost the same movement, wondering if it would make a difference. Maybe it was a problem being by myself, with no one to say it was enough or that the sun was setting. It was just me and the weather.

 

JC:

You're exceeding your ratio of three to one. We're at 11 to one, with 11 hours for your one-hour video.

 

RAT:

Sometimes it’s easier with limitations from others. Without them, I relied on my own needs, like eating after four hours.

 

JC:

Maybe you also got tired of doing the same forms for an hour or two in the sun without shade.

 

RAT:

It's an interesting question: how much better can it get? How much more precise can one take be to convey the meaning?

 

JC:

I always wonder about Stanley Kubrick making a guy walk through a door 84 times for The Shining. Did he use the 84th take or the third? I'm pretty sure he didn't use the 84th.

 

RAT:

It was probably the second one.

 

JC:

It's tunnel vision. Perfectionism can be about stalling, focusing on minor details to avoid bigger tasks.

 

RAT:

In my current project, a car comes through at the wrong moment, so I need After Effects to remove it. It's different from stalling; it's about something ruining the shot.

 

JC:

That's different. Wanting it to be good and look a certain way is valid. But there's a line where stalling occurs. I'm cynical from spending too much time on movie sets. I like doing commercial jobs because they use my skills but aren’t so personal. It allows more freedom and fun.

 

RAT:

Maybe the goal is to bring that freedom back into personal practice. As you gain experience, you have more sets of yes and no’s, and you need to renew yourself and allow experimentation. Letting yourself be free to experiment and play is crucial.

 

JC:

Where did you film it? Where are you in the world? You travel a lot.

 

RAT:

It doesn’t need a specific location, but a plain with a wide view and specific ground was important. I did experiments around Berlin but realized sand was a good material because it's minimal yet changing. I returned to the German East Coast (Baltic Coast) in a small town called Ahrenshoop, an old art village with big beaches, a forest, and natural forces like sand, sea, wind, and trees.

 

JC:

It's an interesting place.

 

RAT:

It's not as white and bright as other places. The coastline changes yearly due to wind and sand. All the natural elements were present, and the area is fascinating with a lot of energy.

 

JC:

It sounds like a good place.

 

RAT:

And it has a lot of history with artists. You see a lot of seascapes and early paintings. It’s a bit kitschy but relevant for my work.

 

JC:

Artists don't have hobbies, you said once. Is that how you got into martial arts?

 

RAT:

I didn’t have hobbies for a long time because my passions became my profession. I needed a hobby, and practicing kung fu for over 15 years became my balance. It's a way to stay healthy, happy, and moving, not just work. Integrating it into my work brought challenges, but I found peace using it as a language.

 

JC:

It's like ballet dancers who are trained to move together.

 

RAT:

In another project, I used a gimbal to mirror a performer’s movements, which was interesting. I might explore this more, with one camera on me doing kung fu and another on a performer. It's about visualizing movement in video with the camera as part of the movement.

 

JC:

I usually stay static when working with dancers, trying to keep them in the frame. But using a gimbal or steady cam could be interesting.

 

RAT:

Movement helps me understand space differently, raising questions about the clash with virtual thinking. Combining the physical and virtual worlds can lead to a utopian combination of their good parts.

 

JC:

We need to make tools work together. It’s not a binary situation.

 

RAT:

It requires strong decisions. Using tools like Google Maps is great, but you need to decide to navigate intuitively sometimes to retain awareness of your surroundings. Balancing both qualities is essential. Now I'm just navigating from what I see and what I know and my intuitive perception of space and navigation I think you really lose a lot of seeing how a city is – how your environment is. I think there I feel like it's so much of like being aware of the both of the qualities and what you can get and make a clear decision. Now I'm actually going back into this other knowledge and possibilities and I think it's really hard.

bottom of page